http://elgg.ell.aau.dk/ryberg/weblog/353.html
I think this is very important! Ensuring free and open access to publicly funded or EU-funded research. If you agree you can sign a petition here: It calls for open access to journal articles and so on after half a year after the publication date. I think this is very important - not only to the general public in EU but certainly also for universities in developing countries who might not have the financial capacity to pay for the subscription to some of the scientific journals. The Journals are owned by very large publishers Elsevier, Sage, Blackwell etc. who have almost a monopoly through buying out smaller publishers.
It seems prices are unreasonable and from what I have read in the Danish paper Information (information.dk) the Norwegian University Libraries have now stopped their subscription to some journals and I mean - it is not like Norway is a poor country!!!
It also seems to be an all-in-all very strange systems - the public pay to universities, who hire researcher to do research for the benefit of society...now all these researchers publish their work in journals, who then the university - and hence the general public - have to pay s**t-loads for purchasing the journal articles...so not only do the public pay to have researchers doing work - they also pay so that the researchers can actually get access to what they are producing...do think that's a strange system...well - sign the petition straight away.
Now, journals do have a role to play - or rather - the process of peer-reviewing has a role to play. This is basically essential for research...but actually I act as a reviewer for a journal...I have never been paid for this work! I wonder how many journals that basically rely on the free work of researchers doing peer-reviews?
I don't see why the peer-reviewing process can't be funded by alternatives to journal e.g. every university in the world could grant time to their researchers for doing reviews...or the money that the libraries spend on purchasing access to the journals could be used to pay academics for doing the peer-reviews?
Maybe, you would say - well, there needs to be commercial options and privately owned journals - else the quality will wither and fall...Well, I guess that was the argument people would use against - say Wikipedia, Linux, Moodle, Elgg and the thousands of other really cool and good open content or open source systems out there... but I am still a young, idealistic researcher - so let me hear any counter-arguments you might have!
Keywords: blog posts, e-learning, Elgg
