Log on:
Powered by Elgg

Pedagogical impact :: Blog

September 06, 2008

http://blog.cicei.com/erubio/2008/09/06/i-jornadas-internacio


































Logo2 Avanza  En el marco del Programa AVANZA hacia el EEES de la Universidad de  Las Palmas de  Gran Canaria, el Vicerrectorado de Ordenación Académica y Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior,  ha organizado  las  I Jornadas Internacionales de Enseñanza Virtual y Teleformación ULPGC.











Según la organización, “los aspectos que debatiremos no sólo están relacionados con la Teleformación, sino también con la utilización de las Tecnologías de la Información en la necesaria adaptación del modelo universitario a las exigencias que se derivan de la implantación del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior (EEES).


No cabe duda de que la universidad en Europa se enfrenta a la mayor reforma de su historia, desde un modelo centrado en el profesor hacia un nuevo modelo centrado en el estudiante, que pasa a convertirse en protagonista de su propia formación. Todos somos conscientes de la necesidad de adaptar nuestro trabajo a estas nuevas exigencias”.


Atendiendo a la convocatoria de participación en las mismas, hemos presentado la ponencia que ha continuación se inserta…









By rob@@425×355}}


Creative Commons License



Keywords: blog, cicei

Posted by Enrique Rubio | 0 comment(s)

September 05, 2008

http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Socialtech/~3/384562595/4th-alt-c-ed

Really looking forward to our fourth ALT-C Edublogger meetup next week, taking place at Leeds Student Union Mine Bar, Tuesday 9th September, 19.30 onwards. The Alt-C evening meal (for those who are attending the conference & have signed up for it) is served in the adjacent Refectory building, and as usual will provide a handy initial meeting point for some of you. Otherwise, head over to the Mine Bar. We may be moving on somewhere else but we'll stay at the Mine Bar until at least 20.30.

We've been lucky enough to have had some great special guests at previous meetups - including James Farmer, Stephen Downes, Barbara Dieu, Christopher D. Sessums and Barbara Ganley. This year's meeting promises to be as jam packed with world-class edubloggers as ever, including Scott Wilson and Graham Attwell. George Siemens will also be in town - he's speaking at ALT-C early Wednesday - and I'm looking forward to meeting up with him for the first time in 3D.

As every - this is an informal, fun get together. You don't have to dress up and you don't have to be an old school edublogger to come along. Everyone who has an interest in edublogging is welcome. To co-inside with F-ALT, the first ever grass roots fringe event at ALT, which will be tackling a range of cutting edge topics in a fast, dynamic debate framework, we'll be holding the microblogging session on the night. Su White will be facilitating speakers Helen Whitehead, James Clay, Jay Cousins, Andy Powell & maybe me in a kung-fu style roundtable. Good quality heckling and any imaginative audience participation will be entirely welcome.

Posted by Josie Fraser | 0 comment(s)

Having just spent all week, planning, re-planning, and re-re-planning I think I'm beginning to understand the life of a mole. As fast as I dig one hole it gets filled in behind me. Associated with this is the endless 'dropping-in' of people into the office. "I know you're busy but ..." or (better) "I know you are having lunch, but ...". As a result I have a desk full of part finished jobs, nothing completed that needs to be completed ... and the clock is ticking.A clock

So what's new in ITE this year? Pedagogy; Innovation; Research.

Here we go again!

Posted by Robin Trangmar | 0 comment(s)

I shall be using this blog to record thoughts and notes relating to a course I am studying at the University of Manitoba in Canada. It is titled Connectivism and Connective Knowledge, exploring the concepts of connectivism and connective knowledge and their application as a framework for theories of teaching and learning. George Siemens and Stephen Downes are facilitating the course and the number of particpants is ... substantial!

Posted by bruce nightingale | 0 comment(s)

http://weblogs.elearning.ubc.ca/chendricks/2008/06/foucault_and_kant_on

I am working on a book review of Foucault and Freedom by Johanna Oksala for a journal, and in the third part she argues that "by linking his thought to the Enlightenment, Foucault makes the normative move of adopting the ideals associated with it--critical reason and personal autonomy--as the implicit ground on which his critiques of domination, abusive forms of power and reason rest. The Enlightenment provides him with the historical--not transcendental-- values on which to base his critiques" (187).


This is a complicated and controversial point, but it is similar to an argument I made in a recent article in the journal Philosophy and Social Criticism, that in emphasizing the connection between his own work and that of Kant, Foucault may have in part been trying to encourage an audience of fellow theorists to consider how their theories can address and impact concerns in their own historical present (as Kant did in some of his texts). Oksala argues that for both Foucault and Kant, philosophy can have an important social and politcal role as critical thought aimed at promoting human freedom and autonomy. I think much more could be said than either I or Oksala have said about how Kant's critiques and his other texts use philosophy as critical thought, as a means of promoting freedom. The point is not only to find the conditions of possibility of knowledge and morality (I leave aside the 3rd critique for the moment, as I am not much familiar with it), but in so doing to promote freedom by releasing us from heteronymy and dogmatism. What further values could we promote or hinder in philosophical pursuit of truth or criticisms thereof? Is it that the question of truth is enough in itself to drive philosophical thinking, or should we consider what else we can do with it? Can doing and teaching philosophy aim towards human freedom? If so, what kind, how, and why is this important? How can we avoid upholding practices and discourses that hinder it? (A Foucauldian question.) What role does the pursuit of truth itself play in hindering freedom? (Another Foucauldian question.)

Posted by Christina HB | 0 comment(s)

http://weblogs.elearning.ubc.ca/chendricks/2008/06/back_from_maternity_

Well, well...it's been awhile. Far too long. I have been busy at home with a new baby boy, and have completely let this blog go. Letting blogs die a quiet death is a common blogger experience, I think. But this one is not quite dead yet. I am back from maternity leave, and though much of this summer will be spent working on research, I plan to add some new posts on teaching here as well. Coming back to the classroom after a year without teaching is, I hope, going to be an interesting and refreshing experience. I am excited to start up again, and catch up on the world of pedagogy blogging, in philosophy and other subjects.


My research this summer will focus on a paper about Michel Foucault's views of the political role of intellectuals. This, actually, is relevant to teaching philosophy: part of what I am thinking about in that paper is what philosophers might do to "educate" their audience, to bring about social and political change, to be active citizens in their own communities. So I will be posting a bit about that, as well as about my thoughts on preparing for my upcoming courses.

Posted by Christina HB | 0 comment(s)

September 04, 2008

http://www.pontydysgu.org/2008/09/blogging-and-podcasting-for-sel


This was recorded live at the EduMedia conference in Salzburg. Many thanks to Andreas Auwarter who recorded the audio and did the post processing.

Posted by Graham Attwell | 0 comment(s)

http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/paulomoekotte/RFnQ/~3/383525407/

onder andere


van deze tijd.


Meer weten? Download de publicaties van de Onderwijsraad


Onderwijs en open leermiddelen en Leermiddelen van de 21ste eeuw


De raad is van mening dat nu het juiste moment is aangebroken om het gebruik en ontwikkelen van open leermiddelen – op nationale schaal – een impuls te geven. De bereidheid van docenten en leraren om gebruik te maken van de innovatieve mogelijkheden van ict neemt toe.



openheid op meerdere niveaus; de organisatie, het leerproces, de werkwijze, de inhoud, instrumenten, infrastructuur en randvoorwaarden voor leren in een open onderwijssituatie.


Nieuwsgierig? Bezoek de Open Education Track van de Holland Open Conferentie op 18 en 19 september


een kernelement in innovatieprocessen.


De moeite en het geld waard?


Kortom, we zien dat openheid als principe of werkwijze steeds meer haar weg naar domeinen als de kunsten, mediaproductie en -distributie, wetenschap en educatie weet te vinden.



Kijk eens bij de Digitale Pioniers of er een projectmogelijkheid is. Vanaf maandag 8 september is ronde 16 van de regeling beschikbaar.




Posted by Paulo Moekotte | 0 comment(s)

http://item.feedsky.com/~feedsky/edutech/~1224293/111028994/122


讲故事是一种传承文明的古老的方式,时至今日仍然有许多以讲故事作为职业。同样,讲故事也是一种流传久远的教学方式,现在仍然在许多课堂上使用。随着科技的发展,讲故事的方式也发生了重大的变化。可以说新媒体和新技术(如:电影、互联网)的出现让讲故事这一古老的事业焕发新的风采。

 

数字化讲故事

数字化讲故事(digital  storytelling),是一种讲故事的新的方法,起于上个世纪80年代,由Dana  Atchley的最先提出。Atchley 是一位专业的说故事者,在计算机科技兴起之时,他看到了计算机科技在媒体运用上的潜力,而积极的结合计算机媒体与说故事的技巧,产生了这种更具创造性的讲故事方式。90 年代由于 Atchley 与其它媒体设计师的大力推广,数字化讲故事已成为 K-12教学的流行工具,甚至美国不少大学也开课教授教师与学生如何进行数字化讲故事的制作。 

什么是数字化讲故事呢?有很多种定义。一般来说就是把讲故事的艺术与多种媒体工具(图片、声音、视频、动画和网页)结合在一起形成的一种新的讲故事的方式。Mclellan(2006)认为数字化讲故事是通过探索不同媒体与软件应用,以新而有力量的方式使用数字化媒体,以便传播讲故事的艺术与技巧。Meadows(2003)则认为数字化讲故事为简短、个人、多媒体且发自内心的故事表达。

数字化故事与传统说故事的最大差异在于故事的呈现方式。故事的呈现方式是一种演进且新旧并存的方式,由最原始的口说方式,发展为受欢迎的电影呈现方式,再到现在信息与网络技术快速发展以后,于电脑屏幕与数字化工具上呈现的方式。

 

学生能学到什么?

数字化讲故事在欧美被广泛的应用于课堂教学。因为,数字化讲故事的魅力不仅来源作品本身,更重要的是其制作过程为学生提供了一个高质量的学习体验。主要表现在以下几方面:

    *  数字化讲故事发展了学生的视觉和多媒体素养。因为数字化讲故事体现的就是使用数字媒体来诠释个人的文字和故事。

    * 数字化讲故事提供给学生有竞争力和说服力的声音来扩展交流的边界,并增加了交流的深度和力度。

    *  数字化讲故事让学生重新拥有创造力,并发展它,增强它,应用以及扩展它...

    *  通过可视化的写作,数字化讲故事能帮助学生更有成效的写作,并且提升他们的认知水平到一个新的高度。

    * 数字化讲故事提供了一个真实的个人学习体验;让学生体会到一分耕耘一分收获;

*  数字化讲故事培养了学生的技术和信息素养,体现在软件的使用,材料的存储和管理,以及版权的识别过程中。

 

制作步骤

数字化讲故事项目最终以多媒体作品形式呈现给观众。下面是作品制作过程:

1.写作;通常写作的材料是来源于学生生活中的情节和体会,经过反复的写作和修改形成一个2-3分钟的精彩的文本故事。

2.脚本:脚本是在文本写作完成后,把故事中的主要情节提炼出来,并用多媒体元素重建故事情节。其间需要标注出所用到的媒体元素及其呈现的时间长度。

3.情节串联图板:在这个步骤,要求学生用情节串联图板来组织故事呈现的流程。即是把脚本和可视化材料连接起来,供最后创作作品时使用。

4.寻找素材:可通过搜索引擎寻找互联网上的图片、声音、视频和动画。也可以用数码相机自己拍摄和创作。

5.创建数字化故事:用软件把各种数字化媒体素材整合起来形成完整的数字化故事。苹果电脑可采用iMovie,PC机可采用微软的Photostory。还有,时下流行的web2.0模式的多媒体混搭工具支持在线制作和分享数字化故事。

6.分享:通常是在教室中与同学分享。现在通过互联网,可以把作品与全世界的人们分享。

 

实施建议

现在,这种用可视化的方式来讲故事是课堂上一种受欢迎的教学工具。下面为教师在课堂上开展数字化讲故事活动提供一些建议:

1.在观赏中学习。

试想一下你喜欢的电影,你会翻来覆去的欣赏。是什么让他们有如此的魅力呢?是对话,角色发展,还是独特的镜头表达方式?同样,不好的电影让你感到很不舒服。为何会这样呢?与学生们一起分析几部著名的电影,你将发现几类讲故事的技巧。

2.技术是作为讲故事的工具而非教学目标。

虽然学生需要学习如何使用技术设备,但是技术教学从来就不是课程的焦点。简单的编辑软件可以采用直观易学的iMovie。如果你有带“火线”连接的数码相机和电脑,我认为你可以开始行动了。你强烈的创作欲望将驱动你的技术学习,因为一旦你认为需要更高级的软件和设备来把一些特定的媒体元素融合进你的作品,你会迫使自己的学习使用它。

3. 允许你的学生超越你。

如果你的学生学习技术的速度比你更快,不用担心,因为他们中的许多习惯于快速吸收技术。你可以把他们的才能转化为教学优势,用来让学生之间相互教学,这样能更充分的展示他们的优点。在课堂上,你将需要优秀的作家,编辑,摄影家,以及技术专家。让他们发挥各自的长处帮助别人,同时也能改善自己的不足,达到取长补短的学习效果。

4. 学习从失败中获取成功的办法。

你必需接受这个事实:常常被技术问题困扰,焦头烂额;并不断的问“这是怎们办到的呢?”没关系!通过在线搜索学习资源,在论坛上贴出你的问题,很快就会得到答案。每个小差错都将考验你的技术悟性,直到你能解决它,并预料学生也会有类似的问题发生。振作起来,并牢记伟大的电影制作人来自非凡的创造力而非技术高手;因为可以依赖他人来完成技术工作。

5.给予学生自由的创作空间,但必须让他们明确责任。

孩子们过去少有这种用来完成伟大创意工作的自由空间。在这种环境中,有些学生会蓬勃发展,而另外一些则需要严密的管理促使他们完成任务。一个好的办法来解决这个问题,就是采用类似劳务合同的方式,让学生定下项目说明和工作进度。

6. 把自己当作执行制片人

教师作为伙伴与学生们一起学习技术和讲故事,但别忘了整个工作由你主导。教师必须为创意的价值和作品的品味把关。作为教师应该比现实中的电影执行制片人更容易掌控一切,因为学生自然会把你当作领导。

7. 别忘了肯定学生的工作。

      不管你是在班级,还是学校,甚至是社区展示已完成的项目,呈现学生的数码故事;这都是一个机会。它会促使学生把作品制作得更专业,并超出你的预期。更重要的是公开的展示让学生会更严肃的对待他们的工作,并对学生产生极大的鼓舞。

Keywords: 教育技术

Posted by zhyujiang | 0 comment(s)

http://item.feedsky.com/~feedsky/edutech/~1224293/111028995/122


据美联社报道,视频游戏《Bully》(学园坏小子)在巴西遭到失败,那里的法官要求停止销售这款视频游戏,因为它对于青少年来说太过暴力。一家当地青少年支持中心请求了这次禁止令。

Bully》是由美国Rockstar公司推出的一款以反映校园暴力为题材的动作游戏,玩家在游戏中扮演一名15岁的问题男生,就读于一所名为Bullworth的寄宿制高中学校,玩家在游戏中面临的挑战是如何对抗老师刁难和学生团伙的欺凌。

法官认为这款游戏不适合青少年。最主要的原因是是游戏中的所有暴力事件都发生在校园中,简直让人无法忍受。判决的结果是禁止网站和实体商店在巴西进口、发布和销售这款游戏。判决生效后,相关公司必须在30天内执行完成法官的判决。

 在美国这款游戏的分级是“T”——适合13岁以上的青少年玩,并不是“M”——适合17岁以上青少年玩。且从官方介绍文字看来,游戏的初衷应该是让学生学会抵制校园欺凌、适应社会。不过玩游戏后的结果却适得其反。

来源:yahoo.com

Keywords: 教育技术

Posted by zhyujiang | 0 comment(s)

<< Back