Log on:
Powered by Elgg

George Roberts :: Blog :: Archives

March 2008

March 13, 2008

http://my-world.typepad.com/rworld/2008/03/cycling-stalini.html

I first wrote this piece in 2002. It is still true. It is both the selfish thoughtlessness of many cyclists and the boorish hostility of motorists that is the direct link to the yet un-won war against fascism.

The greatest struggle of the last century was against Fascism. But, we have forgotten what this struggle was about. It was not a war against foreign nations and evil rulers. Fascism is incipient in our own society too. I am not writing about right-wing racist hooliganism (although that is part of it). I am writing about that tendency in all of us to say that the rules that apply to others do not apply to me; I only obey the laws that suit me; I am above the law.



What does this have to do with cycling? I cycle to and from work five days a week in Oxford. It is warfare on the streets. The contempt with which motorists treat cyclists is frightening — and life threatening. But, in some part, cyclists are to blame. Red lights? Not for me. One way street? Not for me. Lighting up time? Not for me. Pavement? I'll have that. The contempt with which cyclists treat the rules of the road leads to the contempt with which motorists treat cyclists.



It is both the selfish thoughtlessness of many cyclists and the boorish hostility of motorists that is the direct link to the yet un-won war against fascism. Because fascism is the ultimate political manifestation of selfish thoughtlessness and boorish hostility. Fascism arogates to itself both the "right" to make the law and then the "privilege" to apply the law selectively with respect to one's own self interest and relative political power.



The rules of the road are quite clear with respect to cycles. The rules of the road require us all to forgo a small part of our self interest in order to protect ourselves and our fellow travellers: on foot, two wheels or four. Run a red light? Ride the wrong way up a one way street on the pavement? No lights? Twenty mile speed limit? Park on the double yellows? Those rules don't apply to me.



That's fascism and that is what we still have to fight against.

Posted by George Roberts | 0 comment(s)

March 14, 2008

http://my-world.typepad.com/rworld/2008/03/themes-clusters.html

Thematic clusters are a component of the new environment for the U&I programme as we move into the benefits realisation phase. The purposes of clusters are to help support projects, to create a synthesis across project outputs, and facilitate serendipity.

Those of you who are following Emerge developments on the platform may have noticed this post: “Emerging Clusters



The community needs a chance to define its internal dimensions of demarcation. I used a survey to interrogate the community members about their views of dimensions of participation.



The result has been four clusters:

  1. Social networking and collaborative learning through information discovery and exchange



  2. Multimedia social technologies for engagement, reflection and learning



  3. Shifting centres: time, place, agency and technologies for learning



  4. Web2.0 platforms for learning, teaching and skills development



Posted by George Roberts | 0 comment(s)