I have 2 blog posts on the go right now that I can't get myself to complete.
One is on Digital Citizenship which looks at a post by Vicky A. Davis. The concepts I am formulating are in need of some more deep thought, and I don't know when I will get to it?
The second post is on a 1-1 project in our district. I invited myself to a presentation for parents of students receiving computers for the project. Although the post is almost done, (and sitting in a Google document), I'm feeling bitter about my lack of availability of computers to teach my Planning 10 classes and so I don't think I can complete the post until my frame of mind is one that can frame the post in the positive light I feel it deserves. (I feel childish admitting that, but that's where I'm at right now.)
A third post has been looming in my head, but my feedreader fed it to me in the form of someone else's post: It’s time for some perspective here by Kelly Christopherson.
Here is a little more perspective: I am attempting to fully engage, but still can't keep up... I've been to Second Life, but can't find anything useful there... I don't Twitter (yet?)... and to me
Ustream seems like nothing more than a car accident that everyone is slowing down to look at...
All these tools are technological with only the potential to be pedagogical... but they aren't designed with pedagogy in mind. And so with regards to education, I wonder if those in the lead are actually worth following? Will Richardson has a great blog, but I'm not going to give him and his buddy 45 minutes of my time to get information that a 4 paragraph summary of their talk could give me!
...And as for the big hype around backchannels... why do people think this is something worth having transcribed? If a backchannel is used correctly -in my humble, 'perspective from the outside looking in', opinion- then it would influence the presenters, and so the meaningful components would be integrated into the presentation. As for any 'interesting sidebar conversations' that happen- they are mostly relevant in context with the presentation and if they are worth expanding on and investigating... great, investigate them and blog them for me, just don't ask me to read 200+ comments to find a gem in the rough. Backchannels have tremendous value in the 'here-and-now', during a presentation, but what's with all the analysis after the fact? My point is that not only do I not have time for all these new tools, these new tools are time consumers that don't add to my learning experience in a meaningful way.
Going back to Kelly's post, he states:
"Primarily, little has changed with education despite all the tools. I firmly believe that until we examine the curricula, change some of those objectives and rework others, making it relevant to the students, no amount of cool tool is going to create change."
I couldn't have said it better!
[Pink Floyd tune in my head... clocks ticking/bells chiming] The coordination of the Graduation Transitions Program at our school is consuming so much of my time. I have to be realistic about what else I can do!
- How much of the K12Online07 conference will I participate in?
- Is FieldFindr worth spending time on?
- Am I Ning-ing for my Planning 10 class project or blogging?
- When will I finish my other posts?
I could go on but I think my point is made, and I want to turn my questions outward...
- Am I the only one who feels like a 30 hour day would still be too short?
- Are there others out there who wonder what kind of commitment it will take for a teacher to be technologically savvy enough to meaningfully engage students with all these new tools?
- Are we focusing too much on the tools and not enough on pedagogy?
- Will educational structures change fast enough to provide our students with a relevant education?
- ... and for that matter... What would an ideal education look like today?
*Update: What technology should do for us...
I won't violate the copyright, so I will just provide a link:
Learning Authentically in the Language Arts Classroom by Jamie McKenzie
See the bulleted criteria under 1. Rationale ...
I think that if the use of technology is authentic in this way, then the technology is being used appropriately in education. (Rather than just to play with the newest toys, as I seem to be noticing with Ustream- more on this misguided 'use of technology in education' in my next post). Also noteworthy, the author's Anti-Prensky article.
Keywords: 1-1, backchannel, Cool Cat Teacher, criteria, curriculum, datruss, David Truss, Educational Discourse, FieldFindr, Food for Thought, Jamie McKenzie, K12online07, k12online07cl01, k12online07nt01, Kelly Christopherson, learning, My Web2.0, Ning, Pair-a-Dimes, pedagogy, perspective, Prensky, rationale, Second Life, teaching, technology, technology in education, tools, Twitter, Ustream, Vicki A. Davis, Weblogg-ed, Will Richardson
I’ve been limited by the technology my school can provide time and again:-(
About a year and a half ago, I got out of Plato’s cave, saw the vibrancy technology can provide in a student’s learning experience and I have been constantly thrown back into the cave to watch the technology-less shadows… A disconnect indeed!
For me the (hardware) tools are computers, ideally wireless laptops.
For many others, as I have been learning, the (web2.0/software) tools themselves are unimportant compared to access, opportunity, and COLLABORATION TIME. Tools are getting so much more user-friendly, but using them for learning (rather than just to teach old things in new ways), that is the trick. Case in point: I have seen a few blogs where students answer a teacher question, but don’t interact with each other in any meaningfully way.
So for many teachers collaboration time, or training, or professional development opportunities are more important than tools (in my humble opinion).
Put 2 or more well-intentioned teachers in a room and practice will improve. Don’t offer specific tools, offer opportunities for people to Connect & Collaborate & Creatively engage with tools of their choice.
Oh yeah… but make sure they have the technology available to make this time useful when they get back into their classrooms!
Access Granted