Log on:
Powered by Elgg

David Truss :: Blog :: Archives

September 2007

September 10, 2007

Read and comment on this post
at the new Pair-a-Dimes location here:
http://pairadimes.davidtruss.com/presentation-week/

   I have not used PowerPoint very many times in my life. However, I have sat through, and sometimes suffered through, many as part of an audience. So I felt a little intimidated when Nicoletta, one of my Vice Principals in my new school, asked me to create a PowerPoint presentation to introduce the new Graduation Transitions program that I am responsible for implementing. The first presentation would be happening on the first day of school, delivered to almost 80 staff members, most of whom I had not met yet. The next two would be to the Grade 11's and Grade 12's respectively in their Assemblies four days later. 'Great', I thought, 'I get to bore the entire staff and half of the school's students with a PowerPoint presentation in my first week, what a great first impression!'
    Fortunately, I have been thinking a lot about good presentations lately. I've previously written a short post linking to a great presentation, and I found another valuable resource, a post by Joyce Valenza.
    Well, feedback on my presentations has been overwhelmingly good, "The best presentation to staff I've seen since coming here," -this was from a staff member I bumped into in the photocopy room, and "I loved your presentation," -from a grade 11 student who held a door open for me.  I've actually been a little uncomfortable with the compliments. The fact is that I am delivering a good message about a bad situation.

A Little History
'Finally' by thebigdurian on flickr     The original Graduation Portfolio, like Graduation Transitions is a good idea. The problem with the Portfolio was that the Provincial Government implemented it but did not provide sufficient financial or resource support to make it effective and more importantly, meaningful. On the one end of the spectrum, teachers in our district worked very hard to make the Portfolio program work, and just before the final mandatory presentations, the Provincial Government backed down and made Portfolio optional. On the other end of the spectrum our district Student Leadership Council (SLC) initiated a district-wide 'vote' that quite intentionally was biased towards getting rid of the Portfolio. I could write several long-winded posts about both perspectives but in the end what really matters is that the Portfolio program is gone now, and any new program is going to be faced with skepticism, doubt and ill feelings from many students and teachers alike! So now the challenge is to make the new, easier (mandatory) program work, rather than throwing our hands in the air and thinking, "When are they going to pull the plug on this one?"
    The fact is, I believe Graduation Transitions is here to stay. This program has been weeded down to having every student in the Province show evidence that they have considered important aspects around their health, community/work experience and their careers. I don't think that these minimum expectations of a BC grad will be going anywhere soon.

About the Presentation
In the end, I think that I did a pretty good job delivering four important messages.
The messages were:
· What does the new program look like
· This is easier than the previous Graduation Portfolio program
· The intent behind the current program is good
· The program may be mandatory,  but 'we' decide whether to make it a chore or a positive, meaningful experience.

I used a fair bit of comics/humour in the slides, but very little humour in my delivery. I did read a quote off of my slides, but did not really read from my slides beyond that. For the teachers, I used a couple comics at the end to make the point that we can make this much better for the students if we buy into it, and make the most of it. And for the students, I used a series of images to represent the fact that Grad Transitions is the new and much improved version of the Graduation Portfolio that they did not want or like. This was a great slide that was used very early on in my presentation, (the second slide). I wish I could show it here, but I used a few copyrighted images, and although I did not have an issue using them in my presentation, I would not feel comfortable printing them here on a personal blog, without permission. The slide went like this:
An image of an old black & white boxy picture-tube TV with the title "Graduation Portfolio" then an image of a modern flat screen TV with the title "Grad Transitions". This continued with three more images to impress the point.

Graduation Portfolio      Grad Transition
The Flintstones   
Anime Robots
A wall-to-wall 1950's computer A sleek new Emac
A tape cassette Sony Walkman
An ipod nano

    I used some simple slide or fade transitions between images. I spoke about the history and challenges of the portfolio program while this slide played, but it was powerful enough that I think I should have let it play in silence, or had some cheesy video game music behind it, (perhaps Space Invaders for Graduation Portfolio and some ambient music from Warcraft for Grad Transitions). The chuckles in the audience told me that the message was getting through.
    One of my final slides went back to this theme. It was a split screen with a comic on the left, titled 'Graduation Portfolio' that had a juggler with his juggling balls going everywhere, bouncing on the floor, etc. Then on the right hand side, titled 'Graduation Transition' I had an oversimplified gif animation file of a line-drawn juggler juggling 3 balls continuously. I confirmed that, 'Yes, this new program is easier to manage', but it is still important and something you do have to focus on, and fit into your schedule in order to graduate.'
    Both of my presentations, to the staff and to the students ended with this quote: (I did not read it, just had it up as I concluded.)
    
Every thought is a seed.  If you plant crab apples, don't count on harvesting Golden Delicious.
~Bill Meyer
 
    These presentations took a very long time to prepare: Partly because I have not spent a long time using Powerpoint; Partly because the content was so new to me, and because the program is so new that there is little direction yet; Partly because I knew how important this first impression would be. Now despite the fact that the presentations went well, I am not pretending that some, if not many of my audience did not buy into this. The presentation means nothing if I can't implement this program in a way that students feel is meaningful. Teachers will also buy in if they see that students find this a worthy experience. I have a lot to do to make this work!
 
Final Thoughts
    In conclusion, I am very happy that my 'Presentation Week' is over! I learned a lot about creating presentations and again I highly recommend that you read Joyce Valenza's post and follow some of the links she suggests. Also, I am still grappling with copyright issues. The fact is, I am not going to get permission to use an image of the Flintstones in my presentation... that permission would come too late anyway.  But, this was not a presentation made to hand-in to anyone. It created no capital gains for me, and did not have my name attached to it. I did not publish it here on my blog. Is it ok to use copyrighted images for such a presentation?
- - - - -
Image: 'finally' by thebigdurian on Flickr.

Posted by David Truss | 3 comment(s)

September 14, 2007

 
 
"How can the next president better help small business and entrepreneurs thrive?"

   That was the question that US Senator and Presidential Candidate Barack Obama asked on LinkedIn. A day later I posted response #1421. Here it is:

   The definition for 'Entrepreneur' came from Google using 'define: entrepreneur', but I did not link to it since the link does not work.(www.onlinewbc.gov/docs/starting/glossary.html).

   What I did link to was a very gifted student's blog post- (you've seen it here before), a Time Magazine Article found in this student's del.icio.us links tagged 'gifted', and my Square Peg, Round Hole post.

   I don't think that the purpose of our educational system is to 'produce entrepreneurs' but it seems fairly evident to me that we should be fostering the kind of thinking that entrepreneurs possess in our Flat World

   I also don't think that we need to cater specifically to gifted students... on the contrary, what we do to fill their educational needs, to challenge them, and to catalyze their creativity, can (and will) help every student become more ingenious.

Painting by Michelle McGauchie    In his recent post, "Who are we really failing", (which also links to the Time Magazine Article above), Christopher D. Sessums points to a year-old post about a debate, "Transforming Learning: Evolution or Revolution". In this post, Christopher says: 

"Is framing the debate of transformation as an evolutionary or revolutionary process the correct way to look at the current situation? Might there be a better set of metaphors? How might the notion of emergence fit this proposition? What might Paulo Freire think?"

   I think the answer is in the question... it isn't an evolutionary or revolutionary process... it is a transformation that has qualities of both evolution and revolution. There has been a metamorphosis in the way people connect, relate, communicate, and inquire. With regards to schools, education, and learning, you might say that we are in a cocoon right now. Some of us only know what it means to be a caterpillar, others see the potential of being a butterfly, and none of us know where our wings can take us. 

- - - - -

Painting from 'Aquatic Origins' exhibit by Michelle McGauchie. (Used with permission from the artist.)

Posted by David Truss | 3 comment(s)

September 19, 2007

Amy Capelle has started a very interesting discussion in Ning's Classroom2.0 

She asks, "Are they really digital natives?"

The discussion there is great! Here is my response:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

"I come from the Batman era, adding items to my utility belt while students today are the Borg from Star Trek, assimilating technology into their lives."

That's a quote I use to differentiate digital immigrants from digital natives.

BUT I have realized that it is much more about comfort level & exposure than it is about age. While I am helping some frustrated students open a sign-up verification e-mail, other students have logged into the new site, added a photo, and changed the appearance of their personal page.

There are three digital divides here preventing me from effectively using technology in the classroom. (Two from my post, and the 3rd added from the Classroom2.0 discussion.) These divides are the gaps between:

1. What I know and what I need to know.

2. What the school has in the way of technology and what it needs to have.

3. What skills/abilities students enter my class with.

#1 I can change.
#2 will never change fast enough.
#3 is the shift in this conversation.

I have both immigrants and natives in my class, so the distinction is moot.

In another post I said,

"And then there is my class Science Alive! wiki... "I think that I am guilty of seeing the value of using technology in guiding learning, but not effectively guiding learning in my technology use."

I have done a pretty good job of getting my students going... but now as momentum builds I have come to the realization that I don't have a marking rubric to guide me, or my students, as we move towards a final product.

My class is assembling a lego model without the instructions, or even the image of the final product on the front of the box. This isn't a problem for the creative/motivated students; they will assembly a better model in ways that I could never have 'instructed' them... but some students need structure, they have been fed it for years and expect it (even from yours truly - this isn't finger pointing, it is observation).

I let technology supersede pedagogy."


Digital immigrants or digital natives is nothing more than a discussion of digital competence... it is a spectrum, not a dichotomy!

Where does this leave us?
We want all of our students to be digitally competent.
We want all of our students to be articulate thinkers.
We need to make this happen in pedagogically sound ways.
- - -

Let us go to the very beginning of the whole debate and none other Mark Prensky himself. In his article, Adopt and Adapt: Shaping Tech for the Classroom, Prensky says:

"...technology adoption... It's typically a four-step process:

1. Dabbling.
2. Doing old things in old ways.
3. Doing old things in new ways.
4. Doing new things in new ways."


I think we get excited when we see 'new things in new ways', but often we end up (re)creating old things in new ways. The real conversation needs to be around the constraints of curriculum and standardized testing.

"This is why the foundation of education systems today should not be the rails, but it should be the side trips. It should not be the central standard curriculum, but it should be those directions that students, that learners, both teachers and students, can navigate to on their own." (David Warlick)

New things in new ways... creating articulate thinkers... and building digital competence as a by-product.

Posted by David Truss | 7 comment(s)

September 26, 2007

Why should you participate in this online conference? 

  • It's Free!
  • You can participate when it is convenient for you.
  • You can participate as much or as little as you like.
  • You will 'meet' some very interesting people.
  • It will challenge you to do "new things in new ways".
  • It will help you to improve your practice.

Why am I signed up? I have a bit of a history with this conference.

My journey into the world of Web2.0 - the interactive/participatory web, where we create and share content rather than just seek information - started with a webcast of Alan November that challenged me to start my first blogging project with students.

Next, my commitment to consistently keeping a personal blog got started a little later. An early inspiration was the K12 Online Conference 2006 keynote webcast by David Warlick. I wrote a post in response, which I did after the conference was over... welcome to the anytime, anywhere experience of an online conference. However, it is even more engaging to participate during the conference when you can interact and learn with other participants... Join the Learning Conversations!

Just click on the image below to find out more.

Participate in the free K12 Online Conference

Posted by David Truss | 0 comment(s)